Go to main navigation Navigation menu Skip navigation Home page Search

Ukraine’s fight is our fight: Why the west must stay committed

Western support for Ukraine is at a crossroads, and the stakes couldn’t be higher. A new policy brief from the Stockholm Institute of Transition Economics (SITE), authored by Torbjörn Becker, Maria Perrotta Berlin, Anders Olofsgård, and Jesper Roine, argues that continued aid is not only a moral duty but also an economic necessity for Europe, emphasizing that the cost of allowing Russia to win would far exceed the price of sustained assistance.

Europe’s role in supporting Ukraine

Since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, Western countries have poured over €200 billion into financial, humanitarian, and military aid. While the United States has contributed significantly—mostly in military support—the European Union has taken the lead in financial assistance, ensuring Ukraine's government and economy can function.

But with growing uncertainty over U.S. support, European nations must shoulder a larger responsibility. If Europe fails to step up, the consequences could be dire. A Russian victory wouldn’t just devastate Ukraine—it could destabilize the entire European security order, trigger new waves of migration, disrupt global trade, and force European countries to drastically increase military spending.

The policy brief compares Ukraine aid to past financial commitments, such as pandemic relief and energy subsidies. While supporting Ukraine has required substantial funds, these sums are still far smaller than the economic responses to other crises, raising the question: does Europe fully grasp what’s at stake?

Ensuring Ukraine’s victory is not only the morally right thing to do, but also the economically rational alternative.
As the authors of the policy brief emphasize.

Key highlights

  • The cost of inaction is greater than the cost of aid. If Russia wins, European nations will face skyrocketing defense costs, economic instability, and a weakened security landscape. Studies suggest that the long-term financial impact of stopping aid would be 10–20 times greater than continuing support.
  • Europe has the capacity to support Ukraine—if the political will exists. Russia is heavily investing in its war economy, but the EU’s GDP is ten times larger. Matching Russia’s war spending would require only 0.6–0.7% of the EU’s GDP—an affordable price for European security.
  • Public support for Ukraine remains strong. Surveys show that most Europeans approve of current aid levels, and many favor increasing support. This contradicts the idea that financial assistance to Ukraine lacks public backing.

Meet the authors

 

Photo: Anna Pasichnyk, Shutterstock

SOCIAL MEDIA

Follow us on social media to get the latest updates from SITE

  

SITE Politics Policy brief